skip to content »

M1 garand dating

m1 garand dating-39

In March 1927, the cavalry board reported trials among the Thompson, Garand, and 03 Springfield had not led to a clear winner.This led to a gas-operated .276 (7 mm) model (patented by Garand on 12 April 1930).

m1 garand dating-48

In 1936 the M1 Garand replaced the M1903 Springfield as the standard service rifle, the M1903 remaining in use as a sniper weapon.The M1 Garand was the standard service rifle from 1936 through 1957.The result is that the parts kit represents a wide range of places and dates of manufacturing. John C Garand worked at the US Army's Springfield Armory and designed a series of closely related rifles through the 1920s and early 1930s.The M1 replaced the bolt action M1903 Springfield as the standard U. service rifle in the mid 1930s, and was itself replaced by the selective fire M14 rifle in the early 1960s. At Fort Benning during 1925, they were tested against models by Berthier, Hatcher-Bang, Thompson, and Pedersen, the latter two being delayed blowback types.Although the name "Garand" is frequently pronounced Frequently referred to as the "Garand" or "M1 Garand" by civilians, its official designation when it was the issue rifle in the U. As a result, the Ordnance Board ordered a .30-06 Garand variant.And especially if all the other "furniture" and parts are from that same 1944 time frame, that newer barrel MAY be absolutely correct. rifles looked to be "original" were treated by the collecting community as dangerous lunatics. And yes, those parts are "issue" for some Italian rifles, albeit we'll never know which ones.

Likewise, with an H&R from, say, 1953 or as late as 1956, you'll often find a replacement barrel from about 1951, and there's a very STRONG chance that tube is absolutely correct and original. Now we know: a very high percentage of those rifles used government-supplied wartime parts from stock, and were completed and issued that way. It's good to update using sources in addition to the industrial histories, in particular the GCA JOURNAL.

WIN-13 parts arrays are particularly confusing, as the corporate mission of Winchester in those late days was very literally to convert all their M1 rifle parts and pieces to money, as quickly as possible, so tads of very early items and very late stuff show up on undisturbed specimens in a dizzying profusion of permutations. At one time, I believed that the ca.1941-'42 receivers I was seeing with ALL late war parts, including the barrel, might somehow represent catastrophically battle damaged rebuilds. Barrels were especially important, of value, and were tracked somewhat better than, say, bands and ferrules, but by NO MEANS do we or will we EVER know "everything".

So read the footnotes and parenthetical bits, and do NOT be too quick to change out parts that are somewhat later or, sometimes, considerably earlier than the receiver's theoretical "born on" date. So paying to much attention to the date charts and tables can be a critical error.

The collection of parts in the kit probably didn't come from one original rifle.

Even if it did, that rifle had probably been through at least one armory refurbishment.

The following information can be found in the books "The M1 Garand: WWII" and "The M1 Garand Serial Numbers and Data Sheets" found at Fulton Armory, and are used here with Mr. The following information is copyrighted and may not be copied, distributed or used in any other forms of publications, or in any other written or electronic form without the expressed permission of Scott Duff or No monthly range of serial numbers has yet been developed for Post-World War II production of the M1 Garand.